Bill Gabrenya, Editor
I would like to welcome you to the new Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin.
This issue of the Bulletin marks another turning point in the evolution
of IACCP and appears at what may be the beginning of a new era for the Association,
the trajectory of which I have only the vaguest notion at this time.
As you can see, this copy of the Bulletin was mailed from Sage Publications in California, where it was printed on the same presses used to produce the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology and many other Sage journals. This is why it has the same dimensions as JCCP, a size I would not have chosen for a newsletter, but one that various graphics experts have assured me does have some possibilities. Sage has taken over the most onerous tasks that the previous editor, John Adamopoulos, faced four times each year. This arrangement was negotiated by John and Walt Lonner with Sage's Mitch Allen during 1993 and 1994, and I am extremely grateful for their efforts. The style or "look" of the new Bulletin has changed substantially because of this printing arrangement and the availability, free to the Association, of professional publishing services from Florida Institute of Technology's Office of University Publications.
I would like to reveal my plans for the Bulletin over the next four years
and outline how you can help me carry them out. The ideas I will present
reflect my personal feelings about the discipline and are informed by the
results of the reader survey that I will publish in the next issue. I view
IACCP both as a community of scholars with roughly similar interests and
goals, and as a social or cultural organization in which members seek fellowship
and self-fulfillment. The Bulletin is an important medium through which
the parts of this community-separated by thousands of miles and great culture
distance-meet these professional and personal needs. (Of course another
medium, our famous-or famously expensive-conferences also meet this need
for many members.) Whereas other publications of the Association and of
other organizations serve primarily the scholarly goals of the community,
the Bulletin serves the community's needs for social and intellectual communication
and exchange. Our biennial congresses can provide a useful metaphor: JCCP
is attending the paper and poster sessions, presenting data and graphs and
making careful, defensible statements; the Bulletin is hanging out in the
hallways and the bars, debating rather "tentative" ideas and lamenting
life in the trenches of academia. I feel that the Association as a community
could not thrive without both venues. The reader survey results seem to
support this contrast, if not in quite the same words.
What is being discussed in the hallways and bars? I wouldn't dare speak
for everyone (you can't be in all the bars at once), but I think there are
several themes with which most of you would agree. One set of themes is
intellectual, and the other concerns real life.
1. Epistemology. Our "discipline" (if that word could
possibly be used to describe us) seems to have reached an epistemological
crisis. The best-attended regular session I witnessed at the Pamplona meeting
was the controversial symposium on philosophy of science organized by Pawel
Boski. I estimated over 100 people attended, and there was a fair amount
of shouting. People are highly invested in this issue, and it threatens
to polarize or even split the Association. I would like to see these issues
presented and discussed in the Bulletin so all members can participate,
if vicariously, in this important debate. I have begun inviting members
to write articles for this purpose, and I invite all members to contribute
ideas.
2. Indigenization. Indigenization movements seem to be in full swing
around the world, and I sense that people in some places are beginning to
distance themselves both intellectually and socially from Euro-American
psychology and its organizations, and from the use of English as an ad-hoc
common scientific language. These movements will ultimately affect the future
course of IACCP and are a natural subject for discussion.
3. Social science. The question of the ultimate validity of cross-cultural
psychology as it has developed in IACCP over the last several decades seems
to be coming up more and more frequently, usually in conjunction with one
of the above two points. What do we have to offer that anthropology hasn't
already thought of and done better? I feel our relationships to anthropology
and other social sciences need to be examined more carefully and perhaps
the Bulletin can serve as a venue for discussion of this issue and
facilitate exchanges between the social sciences.
Conferences sponsored by IACCP and other important cross-cultural organizations
such as the Society for Cross-Cultural Research drive members into an annual
or semiannual cycle that has strong cognitive and behavioral implications.
I think it would be fair to say that most of our time throughout the year
is spent in the activities that help us make a living, mainly teaching and/or
administering in universities. The conference cycle engages a great deal
of our energy during a small part of the year, climaxing in a few intense,
jet-lagged days following which we must hurriedly return to real life: teaching,
advising, administering, and worrying about our futures in academia. Side-by-side
with brainy talk of epistemology and the integration of the social sciences,
another current runs at the conferences that is motivated by the concrete
problems of living we all encounter in our real lives back home. Several
themes come to mind:
1. Teaching. Most of us teach to eat. Perhaps such a statement is
too strong; perhaps some of us would like to deny its truth. In any case,
I think our common interests draw us to teaching courses in cross-cultural
psychology, so it is natural that the Bulletin should serve as the
discipline's primary teaching resource. There are two ways the Bulletin
will try to meet this need. First, we will begin to publish an extensive
review of the teaching texts now available in cross-cultural psychology.
This project is termed the "Megareview," and begins in this issue.
Second, the Bulletin will include a section in most issues devoted
exclusively to teaching. Harry Gardiner of the University of Wisconsin-La
Crosse has agreed to edit this section. Harry is the most enthusiastic and
effective teacher of cross-cultural psychology I know of and should bring
a lot of interesting and innovative material to the discipline. His first
column will begin in the next issue. (But, not by coincidence, the first
of the "Megareviews" is written by him.)
2. The state of the discipline. For most members, our positions as
cross-cultural psychologists in our local labor markets are a more pressing
concern than the position of cross-cultural psychology in the social sciences.
The general issue of the state of cross-cultural psychology within local
psychologies is an important one, and I invite commentary on this subject.
Speaking for my own labor market, the question of how the multiculturalism
movement will affect cross-cultural psychology is very important. The Bulletin
has tried to address the employment issue over the last few years by maintaining
a listing of jobs in the area. The listing has received mixed reviews, and
is clearly a highly limited endeavor for various reasons, including its
irrelevance outside North America and its lack of timeliness. Beginning
with this issue, I will only publish position announcements contributed
directly to the Bulletin that can appear in time to be useful to
members. (A summary of the data obtained by producing the jobs column will
be published in a future issue.)
3. Local events, conditions, trends, politics. We all live in a social
milieu that extends beyond academia to a national and social system that
affects our lives in many ways, including professionally. I would like to
encourage readers to contribute short articles discussing such local and
regional issues. I will pursue this course in two ways. First, I will lean
heavily on the IACCP Regional Representatives to contribute to the Bulletin
on a regular basis. By the time you read this, I will have sent letters
and/or E-mail to all the Regional Reps outlining what I hope they will do
for us. Second, I will return to a practice that was common many years ago
in the Bulletin: inviting members to write short (about one page
in the current format) articles about themselves. I am especially interested
in obtaining such material from young members, and I will press contributors
to include photographs of themselves or of something interesting in their
locality. Articles that include solicitations (e.g., for collaboration)
are welcome. To facilitate this process, I will use the fine IACCP Directory
published last year by Deborah Best to send letters to members around the
world asking for contributions. If you receive such a letter, please understand
that it reflects no deep meaning; I just happened to find your name in the
Directory. I will also try to bring back the "Inforum" section
that was set aside for miscellaneous personal, self-reported news. I have
set aside one page for printing the Inforum report form.
Empirical research reports. The reader survey results suggest
that readers are not interested in a formal, JCCP-like newsletter, but nonetheless,
consider empirical research reports highly interesting. Based on our experience
with such articles over the last several years, I have decided to discontinue
accepting them for publication except when they are too short for JCCP but
otherwise reflect JCCP's quality criteria. I will forward unsolicited submissions
that are too long for the Bulletin to John Williams for consideration
in the journal. I believe that there are now sufficient publication outlets
for regular-length articles in the field (two new journals have started
up this year alone).
Best of XCUL. I will continue to publish the "Best of the Cross-Cultural
User's List" column in some form. Response to the column has been generally
positive, although occasionally readers ask if it's some kind of gossip
column. If anyone would like to take over the care and feeding of this column,
please contact me for details.
I suspect that I will be the next-to-last editor of a printed version
of the Bulletin. In a far-flung organization such as IACCP, postal
communication is a continual challenge. As many of you are aware, the major
portion of the Bulletin's budget is mailing, particularly air mail
outside of North America. The Bulletin of the future will probably
be published on the Internet in a form similar to the printed version, but
with multimedia capability and instant access. This technology is evolving
rapidly throughout the world, and the form it will take by the early 2000s
is hard to predict. The IACCP Publications Committee is currently discussing
whether or not to begin posting the Bulletin on the World Wide Web,
in parallel with the printed version you are reading. Comments about this
idea should be forwarded to Peter Smith. For examples of this kind of publishing,
look at the magazines listed at the following WWW sites:
http://www.acns.nwu.edu/ezines /
http://www.loria.fr/~charoy/zines.html (in French)
Some specific magazines of widely varying contents:
http://www.awa.com/w2/ (Webster's Weekly)
http://www.internex.net/axcess (Axcess Magazine)
http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/pmc/contents.all.html
(Postmodern Culture)
The Bulletin is a medium for communication among the IACCP membership.
If you wish to communicate with your colleagues in this way, send me something!
I will publish a variety of informal or semiformal materials, including:
As you read this, I have (hopefully) finished putting together the next issue. The new publication process is a long one, so send your contributions with as much lead time as possible-especially if you are submitting time-critical announcements.
I would like to thank the outgoing editor, John Adamopoulos, for his hard
work and dedication to the Bulletin and the Association over the last
five years. John brought to the Bulletin a high level of quality, consistency,
and elegance during his tenure. As a semi-insider to the publication process
over the last few years, I came to know the amount of work John had to do in
handling all aspects of the Bulletin's publication, from soliciting and
editing articles to lugging boxes of envelopes to the post office. John had
to contend with difficulties and frustrations at all stages of the process,
from bearing with procrastinating Association officers to worrying over arcane
postal rules. But as you know, every issue of the Bulletin has arrived
every year since he took over. To whatever extent the next few years are successful,
much of it should be attributed to the high standards John has set.